We're in for a wild ride. Exponentially accelerating technological, cultural, and socioeconomic evolution means that every year will see more developments than the previous one. More change will happen between now and 2050 than during all of humanity's past. Let's explore the 21st century and ride this historic wave of planetary transition with a confident open mind.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Libyan Civil War: What Would Lincoln Do?

As the large scale humiliation of NATO and their mercenary "National Transitional Council" continues into the fifth month, Abraham Lincoln sits down for a public meeting with Colonel Gaddafi to talk war and peace.

 Muammar Gaddafi: Most warm welcome Mr. Lincoln and thank you for being here. Always a pleasure to have guests who managed to successfully resolve mass civil disturbances and earn history's honor.

Most Libyans are familiar with your work. For those who aren't, Mr. Lincoln effectively suppressed a number of rebellious provinces in his home country and thwarted European desire to split USA into parts. Thus, the "second American revolution" as it was dubbed in foreign press never materialized after 5 years of bitter struggle.

Can you tell me what's the key dynamic to watch out for when dealing with a fluid situation like this?

 Abraham Lincoln: Pleasure to be here. Well, the first thing, and probably the most difficult thing, is the initial shock. The sense of betrayal and exasperation. One's ego takes a massive hit you know? How did it come to this? What % was my fault and so on and so on.

The first few weeks, I mean, we had such losses.. defections.. entire states you know? Some old friends and business backers were saying to cut our losses. In such environment it is essential to not become too psychologically paralyzed. One must surround oneself with optimists.

As they say, perception is everything and I remember one general telling me that, "it is essential to invest in perception management early in the game. No other seed grows as much". Since if th..

MG: Since humans are animals and that if loyalist forces hold on long enough in the beginning, the act of fighting and risking life for the regime will modify consciousness via behavioral conditioning. By acting "loyalist" they thus become loyalist as is the case with any other task. Plus this ego construction takes place in environment where lots of adrenaline is released thus burning the newly constructed identity into memory.

AL: Exactly. Mind you the rebels of course undergo same process yet without the benefit of formal military training, industrial capacity, coherent economic promises, absolute domestic support, and well coordinated logistics. Their new ego construction is one of losers. And they are currently dying and getting wounded at such a rate that there wont be too many survivors with Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hour rule under their belt to train new arrivals. In case of Libya and the extraordinary international media propaganda offensive against it..

MG: Thicker and quicker established informational bubble than even those imposed on Yugoslavia or Iraq.

AL: was remarkable how rapidly public opinion in NATO countries changed concerning the rebels. Considering the supposed openness of the Internet, it is amazing how airtight the cloud of lies has been. Yet even with mainstream aggressor press retelling the start of the hostilities not as foreign funded civilian looting of Libyan army bases..

MG: Where soldiers guarding the base naturally shot those who tried breaking in with bulldozers to steal weapons..

AL: Right. Imagine! 1000 secession supporters try to loot a Union base, some get shot, and the foreign press retells it as if soldiers attacked a peaceful demonstration! Anyway, the French, British, American publics felt that something wasn't right.

MG: "The city of Misrata, population half a million, is under brutal siege and has been indiscriminately bombarded by Gaddafi forces for months". Yet only 700 rebel civilians died there! Perhaps NATO definition of indiscriminate shelling has morphed over time but I literally couldn't stop laughing at such slander. They don't realize how much we were holding ourselves back and still do.

AL:  Well the casualty discrepancies were some of the more obvious clues along with such nonsense as allegations of rape as weapon, loyalist supporters not really being supporters at all but doing so due to "threats" against their families, etc. All the standard informational war tricks we've seen before. Yet the most important fact remains that without NATO intervention all of Benghazi and Tobruk would have fallen to Tripoli's armor.

MG: Returning to perception management for a moment. In your opinion, inability of rebels to settle into attrition stalemate independently has planted seeds of doubt throughout eastern provinces early on. This sapped morale which affected everything ranging from volunteer recruitment drives, civil service function, etc.

AL: Yes, considering NATO's history of losing and backstabbing, it was vital for the traitors to make early autonomous victories, victories that never materialized. They were however able to take advantage of government troops not being willing to use too much violence against their brethren, the civilian population, in the very beginning. Even when they were under attack. In other words, we're seeing Western projection onto an enemy of everything they do and plan to do while an absolute informational reversal of how the conflict began is presented.

MG: Your situation in 1860s was different. The rebels had major victories, even tried to invade I believe?

AL: Yes. It was terrible. Fortunately for us, we didn't have air superiority to worry about. One thing I found interesting in a civil war like this is when you reoccupy the area. The insurgency potential is limited since a large chunk of the rebel population never supported separation or feels like they deserve whatever happens once the initial rebellion attempt fails. Even after the civil war dragged on for years, there was almost no insurgency against the occupiers afterwards.

MG: The group of bandits and carpetbaggers calling itself a government in Benghazi is trying to purge people still loyal to me.  You've heard about the officially condoned vigilante justice going on as we speak, the racist attacks against citizens from southern parts of the country under cover of "fighting Gaddafi's foreign mercenaries", the climate of fear, midnight raids?

AL: Yes. A total victory for the rebels would unleash such mismanagement it'd make the Orange revolution in Ukraine seem like a walk in th...

MG: They'll be fighting like dogs over petrol and foreign aid. It has already been decided that 30 billion dollars worth of frozen tax payer's assets are to be given to the kangaroo leadership of Benghazi. They may begin to cannibalize each other even as the fighting with me goes on.

AL: Before I forget, congratulations on withstanding NATO punishment longer than Yugoslavia did. Thousands of sorties is no small..

MG: Thank you. In a way, I have it easier since they are using a third of the planes than they did against Milosovic and aren't targeting vital infrastructure as much.

AL: Right, it'd be absurd for them to mass murder civilians by destroying water and sewage infrastructure, electrical stations, bridges, etc and claim that they're protecting civilians. Especially in the middle of a North African summer. In Yugoslavia's case, NATO blatantly sided with welfare of one ethnic group over the other. NATO has dug its own prestige a grave by using this wording and pretext for the current aggression. They desperately want to break the will of the western population but can't. Violations of the UN resolution such as French weapons drops thus occur rather gradually.

You should have invested in more inflatable tanks. The bomb price versus inflatable decoy price differentials are amazing. They got inflatables that even have a heat signature..

MG: I'm aware of the leaps in decoy tech but shifting gears for a second, how would you handle this?

AL: Serbia, Sudan style splitting of countries seems to be the it thing currently. You must convey to the people that NATO wants to put bases in east Libya to apply additional pressure on Egypt and guide its revolutionary transformation. I would first promise something to the easterners to undermine their morale. The equivalent of freei..

MG: Did it, constitutional reform and such. I can't get through to these people. They are actually flying a flag of a deposed monarchy! I'm dealing with these Berber yokels in the mountains to the west, our version of the Chechens I'm afraid. But for educated urban dwellers to wave it.. shameful.

AL: I mean to promise something tangible like powerful and eyebrow raising new welfare state provisions. The rebels can't counter it considering their neoliberal foreign sponsors and cheerleaders.

MG: Interesting. Like "land, peace, bread" type easy to absorb memes?

AL: Yes. Control over meme flows is essential.

MG: Things have changed since I took office..

AL: At such young age too. I believe you were younger than Castro when you took such an enormous territory, considering the population that is?

MG: And they haven't forgiven since. You know, there was that early shock you spoke off. But then I felt alive for the first time in a while. The old "game mode" was back. One always feels like one can almost hack anything, defeat anything, no matter the odds. That if one can just uncover one weak point, the exploitation of it would create ripple effects leading to victory.

AL: Yes which is why they hope to decapitate the Tripoli government. I'm glad Confederates didn't send waves of hitmen against me early on, we didn't really have the bodyguard culture back then.. but that's ancient history.

MG: We're about out of time. Thank you for joining me. Next week I will talk to president Mahinda Rajapaksa who recently concluded a decades long civil war in Sri Lanka. We'll be talking of mending old wounds and winning hearts and minds.

Stumble Upon Toolbar

1 comment:

  1. This is an ingenious and hilarious juxtaposition in the form of a talk show format! Your take on NATO is accurate to the max. However I dispute the premise because 1) unlike the ney elected Lincoln, ghaddafi was sole dictator and a major wacko for over 40 years! Also the question of an anachronistic and immoral economic system based on slavery makes the American civil war an historical leap forward politically while holding the decrepit and corrupt ghaffai regime in power is a lost. Ause unto itself. Unlike the North in the American civil war, the ghadaffi regime is untenable, like an old bull elephant keeping the status quo intact on spite of all historical imperatives. The ghadaffi regime is a rotten apple waiting to fall from the tree, albeit he has used his billions to prevent that from happening, it's just a matter of time. Without the complicity of NATO Italy and other reactionary forces, ghadaffi would have fallen decades ago. Also, incidentally, Lincoln was a free thinking Aquarius while the senile potentate ghadaffi is a triple Taurus. He survived long after his time doody because of oil money, and now that same oil money portends his destruction!